bouzane said:
Qly said:
bouzane said:
"If you don't understand the game or its depth, refrain from commenting, you only make yourself look like a fool"
Translation: "If you have a different opinion I don't want to read it because I only want to see posts from people with the same opinion as me."
Sorry but that's really how your comments come accross.I think Smash Bros. is repetative, shallow and poorly balanced and I'm perfectly free to say it.
PS. I love seeing people do nothing but criticize games I like (God of War) in an attempt to defend Smash Bros. |
No, there are a lot of things you could criticise about smash, graphics, seriousness, lack of HP, learning curve, not "real" enough, etc.
But criticising smash because of it's depth it's like criticising street fighter because it didn't have 100+ combos per fighter like tekken (I LOVE both games)
I'm just saying there is a lot more to this game mechanics than using one of the 9 moves
|
Perhaps I'm wrong to criticize Smash Bros. for being "shallow" but I just never found them to keep my interest for very long. I always played them like I would play a beat 'em up game like the Streeats of Rage while everybody else would play for hours like Virtua Fighter or Street Fighter but that was never for me.
|
That's cool mate, Everybody it's entitled to have a different taste when it comes to gaming, I for one rarely enjoy FPS, to me it's too much of the same (move, aim shoot) just getting faster and faster I generally finish the story mode, cheating if needed be, and then they just sit there collecting dust (notable exceptions: Goldeneye and Perfect Dark)... however, when I see some Quake III Arena deathmatch vids... I'd have to be blind to call that shallow
