Kasz216 said:
The_vagabond7 said:
I guess I got in a bit late on this one, not much to say at this point.
I think it's obvious that Yeshua existed, alot of Yeshuas existed. I think there is enough evidence to support this very simple hypothesis. A man named Yeshua existed. It's obvious that at least one of them, taught people something. I think the only question is a matter of how much of what is said about him is actually him, and how much of it is proponents of him exaggerating or assigning words to him that he never said and actions he never did. I mean the idea that a guy said something and then thirty years later it was transcribed word for word is a bit far fetched, especially given that the same people say he rose from the dead and appeared in visions and controlled the weather.
How much of it was the actual words and acts of Jesus/Yeshua and how much came from the people creating a religion around him? And given that so many things he did "fulfilled prophecy" even to the contradiction of history and one another's accounts, it's pretty much a given that a chunk of his life was made up for the sake of creating a religion. It's just a matter of how much.
Personally, I'm of the Atheists for Jesus camp. I like to think some guy actually went around teaching most of the humanist philosophy that the gospels ascribe to him, and he was just a profound and compassionate thinker of the time.
Unless you take a faith based view and then of course he's real and walks on water, it says so right there in the bible, case closed.
|
Yeah, i'm not argueing with any of that.
I was just stating he existed.
I think a lot of what Jesus said was likely distorted to fit the peoples views at the time... and that it's the same with basically every religion.
I mean... why does god care if I wear clothes made of wool and linen combined?
|
Are you Jewish? If not, then he doesn't care. The laws of the goyim (non-Jews) and Jews are different. You don't need Jesus to make you feel better about wearing shatnez.
