Avinash_Tyagi said:
Kasz216 said:
Avinash_Tyagi said:
Kasz216 said:
Avinash_Tyagi said:
We've seen people "like" christ exist.
We've also seen things "like" evolution in humans.
We've seen no Christ, or no Evolution in humans.
Heck while we do have first hand evidence of spontanious generation. (later proven false.)
Your standards of proof are screwed up.
Not at all, y'see we have seen evolution actually happen in other creatures, and we've seen evidence that infers evoultion happeninging in homonids, as you yourself stated we have first hand evidence of evolution, so we know that evolution occurs, now then if we knoe that evolution occurs and we see evidence that infers evolution occuring in Homonids, we can be fairly certain that homonids evolved.
However we have no first hand evidence of Christ, and only unsubstantiated second hand evidence of christ, the evidence for Christ is much weaker than the evidence for evolution |
We have proof that their were leaders of jewish sects. (other jewish leaders of sects.)
We have proof that infers Jesus existed (The bible, roman second hand documents.)
We have proof that bacteria evolves.
We have proof that infers homids evolve. (Skeletons).
|
Not quite the same again, you see you say that becuase we have the evidence of other leaders of Jewish sects we have evidence to support Jesus, no, we have evidence that support that there are leaders of Jewish sects, but not that there was one leader named Jesus.
Humans on the other hand are made up of cells, we know that so if one cell can eveolve then we can infer that mutliple celled creatures can evolve, but we are not saying that one particular memeber of one species of the Homonids evolved
|
Actually, it's exactly the same. Hence the problem. Your using second hand evidence to infer either way.
|
Nope, because you're talking about one particular individual, not a group of individuals, like a species, one thing to infer a species, evolved in a particular way, another to infer one individual existed
|
Second hand evidence. Sorry.
Since you said we can only decide these things through first hand evidence. Guess there is no proof.
