Avinash_Tyagi said:
Kasz216 said:
Avinash_Tyagi said:
Final-Fan said:
Avinash_Tyagi said:
Final-Fan said:
There isn't 100% certainty of anything. |
So then why did you guys waste pages and pages arguing with me? |
For me, because the case for "Jesus existed" is beyond a reasonable doubt. (As opposed to beyond any doubt.)
|
Ah but where is the reasonable line drawn? For each person it is different, and each person may give differeing weights to the arguments
|
The actual reasonable line.
If you believe there isn't reasonable evidence jesus existed... Then you basically can't believe in about 80% of recorded history.
Lots of people who we know volumes about often aren't even refrenced about except in one paragraph of second hand knowledge and the like.
|
How can you know volumes about someone with only one paragraph? Most volumes require many paragraphs
Plus its good to remain fairly skecptical of most of history:
History is a pack of lies about events that never happened told by people who weren't there
|
Archaelogical evidence.
Archaelogical evidence doesn't tell you who people are (most the time) only what the people were like.
You could find a crapload of stuff owned by a regional govoner of rome.
Yet not know who he is until you read about how the govonor of that territory met with Caeser once.
