Final-Fan said:
ssj12 said:
fkusumot said:
ssj12 said: It makes perfect sense if you look at the confines of what it means to do a crucifixion. The only time it was used was when someone did something horrid against the empire or shook the general order of things.
If it is not used in the way it was originally meant to it would fall into basic torcher rather than defending the beliefs of your kingdom.
The crucifixion of Christ was justifiable but if some random joe gets crucified without stirring up a load of crap like Jesus did that it is not justifiable. |
Wut? I thought Jesus was crucified with some petty thieves. Which Bible you been reading ssj?
Also, I thought Pontius didn't want to crucify Jesus but he bowed to political pressure. That makes it justifiable? |
I havent touched a Bible since yesterday since two copies where at my register at WalMart. Otherwise havent touched one since I was 8.
Anyways it was the Romens that called for the crusifixion of Jesus. |
I thought the Romans were the ones who did the crucifying, but the Jews were the ones pushing for it.
|
Yeah... that's the part of the bible that never really made sense, and i'm almost positive was written that way to cover their asses from getting killed.
Just how i'm sure most of the apostles were probably never martyred.
Cause like, the regular people seem to go "Yay Jesus!" to "Kill Jesus no matter what!" in a matter of minutes.
Unless it's like, mostly different people and the bible was just inflating how many people loved jesus.
Then again the "Common murderer" described in the bible was actually a Jewish rebel who fought for his people and not a common murderer.
So it may of just been that they were for the more proactive revolutionary.