By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fkusumot said:
ssj12 said:

It makes perfect sense if you look at the confines of what it means to do a crucifixion. The only time it was used was when someone did something horrid against the empire or shook the general order of things.

If it is not used in the way it was originally meant to it would fall into basic torcher rather than defending the beliefs of your kingdom.

The crucifixion of Christ was justifiable but if some random joe gets crucified without stirring up a load of crap like Jesus did that it is not justifiable.

Wut? I thought Jesus was crucified with some petty thieves. Which Bible you been reading ssj?

Also, I thought Pontius didn't want to crucify Jesus but he bowed to political pressure. That makes it justifiable?

Keep in mind that's from a book... put together by the Romans... and also written at the time where if a roman was cast in a poor light your likely to get yourself killed.

But yeah.  Crucifixition was more of an embarresment execution then anything else.

Jesus would of been seen as a "Rebel" hence the crucifixion.