on earlier comments.
Calling jesus a Mythological being is wrong.... he's a theological being as his religion is still active. Saying he is a myth is insulting all who believe in him as myth implies nonexistence.
That a man inspired others and had many folowers needs no proving as it still happends often nowadays. This makes existance of a Jesus Character pretty certain... what should be argued is his whether his history is relatively faithfull and the reality of his divine origin.
Do remember that religions have often incorporated the tales of previous ones... However rare are the ones such as christianity and islam that create central figure for the religion that can be put on a time scale with ease. This is to say that these characters are real and not myth, even though their claims of being messia can be doubted.
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
