Hamas legalizes Crucifixion

[Avinash_Tyagi]

Kasz216 said:

Avinash_Tyagi said:

Kasz216 said:

Avinash_Tyagi said:

Kasz216 said:

Avinash_Tyagi said:

Kasz216 said:

Avinash_Tyagi said:

 

 

 

Based with that kind of historical critera basically nothing can be proved.  Second hand accounts aren't any less reliable then first hand accounts historically because first hand accounts could of always been faked too.

It was VERY common for first hand accounts to be greatly embelshed or in large points made up.

Hence why there is a modern historical process used to determine what's true and what isn't.

There are plenty of things that even a pure historical review of the bible that proves Jesus existed... like the fact that despite the attempts to portray him as a perfect son of god there are facts about him not favorable for the messiah.

 

That doesn't actually prove anything though, all that proves is that the stories of Jesus have not favorable things to say about him, even novels today have parts where the heroic main character is seen as less than perfect.  Where he is seen as a jerk or a coward or a cheater.

 

None of the historical process proves Jesus's existence as fact, only that there is writings of a man named Jeuss, who may or may not have been real.