Avinash_Tyagi said:
Kasz216 said:
Avinash_Tyagi said:
Kasz216 said:
Avinash_Tyagi said:
No actually there isn't, in fact there is the Jesus myth hypothesis, so it has not passed the test of historical critiscism or certinty as there are those who hypothesize that the stories are not real
|
Those who hypothisize this are frauds.
Why else would the Romans... before they went Chrstian mind you. Refrence that they crucified him after the fact if they didn't?
|
Actually there isn't many secular records of Jesus's crucifixtion, and the ones that do exist, like Tacitus, was written decades later
|
Yeah. That's my point. Decades later... while they still were pagans... the Romans refrence crucifying jesus.
Why would they do this? When they have more to gain from denying his existence?
No doubt there is a record of jesus' execution, but it's no different then the record of the execution of a theif or another prophet.
It wasn't until decades later that Jesus became anything to write about in the non religious world.
Once Chrsitanity was proven it was here to stay and not just another crazy Jewish sect gone in a few months....
THEN we get histroical refrences of Romans talking about how they crucified jesus.
If they didn't, it would make much more sense to deny he never existed since it would rob the religion of it's power.
|
See you think that i'm saying its some vast conspiracy, not at all, i'm saying it was a legend that was formed around stories, back then there was no tlephone, or newspaper, and no internent, and most couldn't read or write, rumors and stories were passed by word of motuh and like any game of telephone will show you each step they get changed and embellished. The fact is none of that supports that there was a real jesus, only that a legend of jesus existed, like the legends of the greek/roman gods
|
So. Your saying the romans... made up the fact they crucified jesus to go along with the religion they were activly trying to wipe out?
