By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Avinash_Tyagi said:
Kasz216 said:
Avinash_Tyagi said:

 

 No actually there isn't, in fact there is the Jesus myth hypothesis, so it has not passed the test of historical critiscism or certinty as there are those who hypothesize that the stories are not real

 

 

Those who hypothisize this are frauds.

Why else would the Romans... before they went Chrstian mind you.  Refrence that they crucified him after the fact if they didn't?

Actually there isn't many secular records of Jesus's crucifixtion, and the ones that do exist, like Tacitus, was written decades later

 

 

Yeah.  That's my point.  Decades later... while they still were pagans... the Romans refrence crucifying jesus.

Why would they do this?  When they have more to gain from denying his existence?

No doubt there is a record of jesus' execution, but it's no different then the record of the execution of a theif or another prophet.

It wasn't until decades later that Jesus became anything to write about in the non religious world.

Once Chrsitanity was proven it was here to stay and not just another crazy Jewish sect gone in a few months....

THEN we get histroical refrences of Romans talking about how they crucified jesus.

If they didn't, it would  make much more sense to deny he never existed since it would rob the religion of it's power.


According to the Romans... they crucified jesus.