Avinash_Tyagi said:
Actually there isn't many secular records of Jesus's crucifixtion, and the ones that do exist, like Tacitus, was written decades later
|
Yeah. That's my point. Decades later... while they still were pagans... the Romans refrence crucifying jesus.
Why would they do this? When they have more to gain from denying his existence?
No doubt there is a record of jesus' execution, but it's no different then the record of the execution of a theif or another prophet.
It wasn't until decades later that Jesus became anything to write about in the non religious world.
Once Chrsitanity was proven it was here to stay and not just another crazy Jewish sect gone in a few months....
THEN we get histroical refrences of Romans talking about how they crucified jesus.
If they didn't, it would make much more sense to deny he never existed since it would rob the religion of it's power.
According to the Romans... they crucified jesus.








