Avinash_Tyagi said:
Actually not so much, you see most of the writings of Jesus were done decades after his supposed death, most of the idea of jesus as a person has been based on writings done at the time, we have very little actual evidence beyond those writings.
|
Very little yet still enough... He's mentioned by Josephus... and not the part that's a forgery either.
and as much as you want to say about the bible... large parts of it are being proven more and more historically accurate.
Sure there is a bit of made up in it, in how things happened... but it's a good historical source all things told.
Furthermore there is plenty of historical evidence of his early followers and of his disciples.
The thought that jesus might of been a myth is basicaly an abandoned theory that is only parroted by people looking to make a quick buck.








