I believe his point isn't that hardcore Nintendo games should have their scores inflated, but that it's absolutely senseless for a publication to award intentionally low scores, if this is actually happening.
His argument is similar to what some Republicans have been saying recently - the Democrats are bound to win '08, so we need to make sure that their most conservative primary candidate wins the nomination. It's a waste of time and is actually harmful to the cause to continue to attack, say, Hillary, because it might prevent her from being given the nomination. The Wii is an inevitability at this point - there's no fighting against it, and all that's left to opponents of the idea is to try to influence it as best they can.







