polezo on 23 December 2008
| ioi said: As ever nordlead has it about right. Essentially GAF didn't understand and in general still don't seem to understand the point of VGC - to offer reasonably accurate original estimates as an alternative to other figures which often take longer to arrive and are often kept under wraps. Same is true with GoNintendo and others. The mistake that they make is to assume that we are claiming our data is perfectly accurate - which we are not. It's good to see that GoNintendo now seem to understand where we are coming from and are happy to reference us in a similar way to analysts (which is exactly what we want from people) - we are at least as accurate and credible as the likes of Pachter and EEDAR in my eyes so credit to GoNintendo for posting this - let's hope others can see the light as well... |
Huh... Glad i could be here to learn about some of vgchartz history. Thanks guys, and keep up the good work
