First off, I want to thank everyone for their feedback. A few notes before I reply directly:
1) This thread was mostly done in jest, and should not be taken too seriously. I thought it would be fun to try and find some common ground.
2) I understand nobody is going to completely agree with everything. With treaties you have to give a little. It’s all about compromise.
3) I apologize for the sloppiness of the OP. I wrote this at work, and I didn’t have time to proofread as well as I would have liked.
Now… on to the feedback.
- I don’t know how I missed article 3.6… doh!
- Article 1.2 is tough to argue with. Personally, Nintendo isn’t my favorite developer, but their history is incredible. They by far have the largest amount of quality to junk ratio. Microsoft and Sony on the other hand release games like too human & lair… yeesh. I’d also like to point out Nintendo releases amazing titles that are fun for everyone.
- In article 2.5 we should strike the following: “Console exclusives will”. That was just sloppy.
- According to cnet.com the 360’s dvd playback has received poor reviews, while Sony’s have been excellent.
- I agree we should strike article 3.7. I think the point about themes is a good one and I can understand how someone might favor Sony’s interface..
- I standby article 1.7, it would be nice if it had dvd playback. Perhaps we can change the wording to sound less harsh?
- Article 3.5 seems to be a topic of debate that should be further discussed.
I updated the OP and showed the revisions.







