On the 360:
"At the end of the day you still have a straight forward CPU GPU chipset that can be easly learned and taped out very fast by devs. The Devs will greet this with open arms as it gives them the ability to rake in the cash, but it is not the best for gamers."
I don´t get it, how does this let Devs rake in cash ??? This is no where explained, if anything the Wiis lower dev costs would justify such a statement, but since 360 games cost about as much as PS3 games this does not make any sence at all. How could easier programming be good for Devs but bad for gamers ??? These are just claims with no explanation. Any benefit for developers will be handed down to gamers. Better games can be made faster and at less cost, how is this bad for gamers ???
Lots of stuff in the article make sence and are known facts but stuff like this make no sence at all. Eventhough its an interesting read I don´t care fore the style and bias that it offers.
