tabsina on 20 December 2008
jedson328 said:
I dont care what you are implying, the quality of the final product had no relation to it being a PS3 exclusive. Those games were awful, and would have done poorly on all 3 consoles. |
I don't necessarily agree with the post you quoted, but the difference is that the development costs (and hence money loss) was higher than if it were a 360 exclusive, and moreso if it were a wii exclusive
And I believe frybread was simply answering the question "what do the two studios have in common?".. the only other thing I can think of is that they have both only released one game this gen (each of which, as pointed out by frybread were PS3 exclusives)
