By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

@ HappySquirrel

The fact of the matter is that you see the PS3 being in a different position largely because you believe that consumers will end up choosing the console with the most theoritical processing power or largest list of features.


No, features, specs, price, etc are all factors to take into account.

by 2009 the PS3 will be dramatically more expensive than a Blu-Ray player and people will stop seeing much value in the PS3 as a gaming machine (because its slow sales will have hurt its game library)


IMO just speculations. With regard to games I think that's very unrealistic, it's clear the PS3 will have a huge games library judging from all the games being under development and many more new titles being announced regularly.

if Sony was willing to lose Billions of dollars this year to reduce the price of the PS3


Bad plan. IMO it's much better to just continue running a profit overall, continue to cost reduce the PS3 and wait for the high profile games to hit the market and see how well the platform performs.



Naughty Dog: "At Naughty Dog, we're pretty sure we should be able to see leaps between games on the PS3 that are even bigger than they were on the PS2."

PS3 vs 360 sales