By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

I'm not going to say their conclusion is wrong, as I don't own all 3 consoles, and am thus unable to do so. What I am going to say though, is that that was bullshit.

 

Why is it important for the Ps3 to have a higher % of the total released games, that appeal to IGN? As long as it had more, that should be enough.

 

The entire % of the total games is just meaningless, as it proves nothing really. Well, it proves what every non-retard knows... Higher userbase = lower % of good games compared to total games.

 

Want an example?

% of GC games = 9.0 + (IGN) ~ 10%

% of Ps2 games = 9.0 + (IGN) ~ 7%

 

Does this mean that the GC had more 9.0 + games? Nope. It had ~ 50, the Ps2 had ~ 140.

 

So the entire % thing is bullocks.

 

The score average suffers from the same thing, so that's meaningless too.

 

Why anybody cares about the number of games reviewed is odd too.

 

 

As for the pure how many scored 7.5 +, 8.5 + and 9.0... I don't care about that, but if you trust review scores in the first place - that's what you should care about. Those 3 graphs, the rest is just meaningless.



http://www.vgchartz.com/games/userreviewdisp.php?id=261

That is VGChartz LONGEST review. And it's NOT Cute Kitten DS