By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Jackson50 said:
Moongoddess256 said:
This thread is too long for me to read through, but I'm sure there is a couple of people defending the parents and saying they should have done up the cake. A supermarket is private property. If management says so, they can do what they want, ban whoever they want, disallow what they want. Even cops can be kicked out of a store. If they said they wont do the cake, then theres no law saying they have to. This isn't public property, this is in the house of (whatever corporation they are).

And really, this is a good business move on their part. Theres are a lot more Nazi haters than lovers.

No, an owner of private property cannot discriminate if they provide public accomodations. This is includes but is not limited to restaurants, hotels, and grocery stores.

 

 

 

And who the hell is willing to consider that "discrimination"? I sure as hell wouldn't interpret it as such.

I'm pretty sure "discrimination" only applies to very specific things. As I found out when I got terminated from a gov't job unfairly.

Edit: I just clicked on that link you provided, it says right in the first line " without discrimination on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin"

Says nothing about discrimination on the ground of naming your kid after one of the most evil figures in history.



[2:08:58 am] Moongoddess256: being asian makes you naturally good at ddr
[2:09:22 am] gnizmo: its a weird genetic thing
[2:09:30 am] gnizmo: goes back to hunting giant crabs in feudal Japan