| nordlead said: I'm of the belief that it isn't fact, as the world is to complicated to make a valid model of. 1 tiny little error in your model could lead to global warming or global cooling. Also, we only have what, about 100 years worth of actual temperature recordings? Past that we just guesstimate to suit our model. Also, the same scientists that believe in global warming now, believed in global cooling 40 years ago and wanted to emit tons of CO2 so as to increase the earths temperature. Now, that doesn't mean we shouldn't be energy efficient or anything like that, as that is just being smart and efficient. and this will be my last post in this thread, as it will quickly erupt into a giant debate that I don't wish to be part of, but since I'm first I will post. |
Correct, recorded temps go back to 1889 in most areas. Sufficient global temperature recording wasn't started until the 1970's and sufficient ocean temperature recording was not implemented until the 1990's. So the data for their model is very limited and weak.
I am a strong beiever in global warming(as marketed in the world) being nothing more than a global scandal instituted to aid the largest redistribution of wealth ever. There is more evidence to support this conspiracy than to support the global warming argument, such as the largest investors in research of global warming are at the forefront of the redistribution of wealth.
Also, huge lie: carbon emitted from automobiles is one of the leading sources of ozone CO2 levels. It's a total garbage of a lie. CO2 emitted from vehicles isn't a barrier gas.
Global Warming is a marketed phrase. It is fictional based off of loose interpretations of real data. Climate change in relation to the human effect on climate is the scientific question. Yes the climate is changing, but it is evident that this is a natural cycle of earth. The question is, to what extent has man impacted this. It is equally as foolish to say man is responsible for climate change or has not impacted the climate. When it boils down to it, thereis no feasible way to make a correct analysis of this due to the incredibly small sample size of recorded data and the large natural cycle of Earth's climate.
