rocketpig said: The parents might be bigots, racists, and completely fucking stupid, but where is the ACLU in situations like this? If you see a difference... I have a question to ask you. Who made you judge, jury, and executioner on other peoples' beliefs? Just curious. |
There's actually a big difference between the real situation with that store and your little hypothetical one. Writing a cake adressed to Adolf Hitler could concievably hurt sales. Who wants to go to a store that supports Hitler, the Nazis, etc.? Of course, that's not what's really going on, but it could easily be percieved as such by someone who just hears about it in passing. Their decision not to serve them can not be proven to based solely on that family's beliefs. It can very easily be argued that the store believed serving them would hurt sales in general, and thus refused to do so. It's hard to argue that when it's a Muslim name. In fact, not serving them would probably do just as much damage as serving someone advocating nazism.