By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
leo-j said:
tk1989 said:
Well, i still stick with the fact that the original Killzone was very disappointing. The new "halo beater" it was meant to be, something it never aspired to. As a result of this, i dont see how Killzone 2 is seen as one of the PS3s main games, especially when the original wasnt actually that good. Ill admit it though, the graphics do look good, but then what games dont have good graphics these days?

Ill reserve judgement on it though until it is released, but good graphics doesnt = a good game. Look how Lair turned out... apparently it only got 5/10 in a PS3 magazine, and that was meant to be one of the PS3's big games.

Look I played killzone, let me tell you that the gameplay in killzone 2 is 100times more entertaining, killzone 1 was extreemly boring and dull. The story was good though.


 do you own Killzone 2? cos i dont see how you can make the assumption that its 100 times more entertaining without having actually played through it.

 

Im just trying to make a point. The game does look good from the video; I like the graphics, and it looks intense with constant action, but youve gotta remember that its meant to as they're promoting it! the point of my argument wasnt that it looks crap, but that i will wait until it is actually released before making the assumption that its good or not, especially because Killzone 1 was hyped and turned out to be pretty bland and boring.