twesterm said:
I guess having 1 in 4 people like it isn't bad...oh wait... Anyways, I think they were just really pressured to release it this year and this is what we get because of that pressure. Something that is boring, lifeless, waste of time, buggy and something that people just aren't going to return to. I know people keep screaming that it's free and it's still beta, but PA put it best saying that "it's no virtue giving away something for free that no-one in their right mind would buy." To make the lack of life and that barren feeling even more insulting, we're expected to pay to make it seem not so barren. Again, no-one in their right mind would buy generally translates to no-one in their right mind should spend money on that no-one in their right mind would buy thing. As for the beta excuse, that's just a shield and a weak one at that. As I said, Home was forced to be released long before it was ready so they just say it's a beta and will always be in a beta kind of like Google. That's just bullshit. I don't know about Google, but generally to be in beta a game has to meet these cryteria or something close to it:
So how many of these does Home fit?
So stop using the it's free and and it's in beta defense. Home is released and it's free because no-one in their right mind would buy it. It perhaps had the potential to be cool, but since it was released way too early it lost anything it had going for it. Right now it's just another dot on a long list of failures from this gen.
|
1 in 4 eh. So if Sony sold 20 mill PS3's thats means what, 5 mill will like it. Thats pretty good, especially if they purchase a pounds worth every month at least, that would be a revenue of at least 5 mill pounds a month. Damn thats bad news.







