Kasz216 said: konnichiwa said:
twesterm said:
Killzone3 said: 9,9,9,7,5
ok am i the only one seeing an average of 78%
Length of game or lack of online and price are damn subjective, to me 6/7 hours are worth alot more then the 18 hours i spent on FF12 before gave up out of boredom. |
Whether you liked FFXII or not is irrelevant, what isn't is that $60 is too much to pay for a game that's only 6-7 hours of single player. Maybe if it was 1987 I could understand a game that length but it's pretty said for such a major title today. |
First they say it is less than ten hours.
Then someone with the word 'WII' in his nickname says it is 8 hours of gameplay.
Now you say it is 6-7 hours of gameplay. What is next? Soriku who comes in this thread and says it is 10 minutes of gameplay because The people who will buy it will throw the game after 10 minutes in the garbage?
-_-.
|
A reviewer said it was 6-7 hours of gameplay. |
Damn, beat me to it. I fully believe that the game was originally planned to be in the 15 hour range is perfectly acceptable but I also fully believe that during development things were cut, enemies were reduced for optimization, and things were made easier to make the game fun effectively cutting it down to 6-7 hours.
Hey, look on the bright side, if this were a PSP game you could almost play it on a single charge (I probably shouldn't have gone there, this thread is already bad enough).