numonex on 11 December 2008
| Fumanchu said: As of today there is NO game that demonstrates a technological advantage that would equate to a $200 price difference... Answer me this; How many games do you see utilising the maximum potential? And what number will deem the extra $200 worthy? You shouldn't be able to get a game like Gears of War 2, which looks better than (i'll be generous) all but 5 PS3 games on a machine that's $200 cheaper...and no we're not waiting for next year - you told us that last year. |
Gears of War 2 looks better than all but one PS3 game: MGS 4, which is equal to Gears of War 2 in terms of graphics. But some people even say Gears of War 2 looks better than MGS 4.
