Killzone = Halokiller ?

[Dianko]

ChronotriggerJM said:

Jereel Hunter said:

ChronotriggerJM said:

I'm with Feylic ;/ they better not aim so low. In my personal opinion Halo was a generic/sloppy shooter. It seems as though they have much higher standards for they're FPS. And I'd personally prefer it that way o.O;

In terms of quality, MANY games are "halo killers". In terms of sales, no FPS will ever pass it :P

 

Perhaps in terms of superior single player campaigns. However KZ2 would be very fortunate to be an equal multiplayer experience to Halo 3, despite coming out more than a year later.

 

See but personally, I found Halo 3's multiplay to be garbage o.O; I think the guns are boring, the shields are obnoxious, and the overall pace is just morbidly terrible, how is it the chief can jump like 100 feet in the air, but can't move more than .4 miles an hour?I think the vehicles are just terrible and the game just feels like it's got no soul.

The multi-player just isn't fun. I'd much rather play tribes :/ which was like 10 years old. It's beyond me how Unreal Tourney can come out on the 360, and yet so few people picked it up :( It just saddens me.

Be that as it may, there are many others, such as myself and millions of others, who do not agree with you. It's all subjective, but you cannot deny the appeal the game has in a larger cotext. Even among players who you mention play shooters with more oomph, many are still addicted to Halo MP.

Killzone 2 will be lucky to match multiplayer juggernauts like COD4 and Halo 3. I hope it does.