Killzone = Halokiller ?

[Tigawoods]

ChronotriggerJM said:

Yeah, I get the whole relative thing, I just don't think I need to move slower than most games with regular human characters :(

The vehicles are too slow at that point ><

Not to hype up another game, because I'm not really here for that, but warhawk. You start on one end of the map, and start running, you'll end up on the other side in a good 7-10 minutes o.O; the maps are enormous. But you hop in a warhawk, and hit your turbos, you can get there in less than 30 seconds. It feels so fast, you feel like your in control of something seriously awesome :P Halo just feels so "mellowed down" for all ages :/ I mean I understand why it is, it's one of the contributing reason's it's so popular. It needs to be playable, and fun, for all ages and groups. But to me, that's what makes it so boring. There's nothing to really pick up on, nothing to really master. Aside from regular FPS stuff :x Head shot's with snipers, etc etc etc. It's entirely too generic for my tastes, and I would personally HATE if Killzone aspired for that.

 

 I can see where you are coming from regarding Halo in terms of pacing etc etc. If you play the MLG formats it plays at a  much faster pace. If I could compare it to something I'd say it feels more like a paintball arena and you are playing speedball. On these formats movement speed is increased and and the damage is ramped up and it feels closer to an unreal-style gameplay than without the formats.

OT: Regarding Killzone 2 as the "Halokiller" I haven't really seen a lot of people use that term lately. And I agree that it has more in common with COD 4. However, regardless of what people compare it to I severely doubt it is going to see the same reseults as KZ 1 and it will be an 85% on Meta at the least. My 2 cents.