BengaBenga said: I agree there won't be a single JRPG console to own. Untill now it's clearly the 360, but next year there will be a lot of Wii JRPGs. PS3 is kinda sad atm. Fire Emblem doesn't have any benefit from being published by Nintendo, aside from maybe being available at retailers (which isn't even the case) due to good distribution. There was no advertising for it and it doesn't have any recognizable Nintendo mascots. It simply sold well because, contrary to popular believe, there actually ARE hardcore gamers on the Wii. |
Ugh, this post is almost as bad as his.
The PS3 just had Valkyria, Disgaea, and Eternal Sonata released. Two great and one reasonably good (and slightly improved) game. Valkyria is without question in my mind the best one released so far this gen (and, if you ever get to play it, far better than Fire Emblem). It's ridiculous for you to sit there and defend Fire Emblem sales then say the PS3 can't sell JRPGs, when it's just released two fellow SRPGs, which as you know is not a high selling genre, and Eternal Sonata is incredibly late on the market.
Disgaea is selling in-line with all previous games in the franchise, and was cheap to make. Valkyria is selling nearly in-line with Fire Emblem, an already established and well-known franchise, as a new game on the market.
I will bust balls on all sides of an argument.