tabsina on 08 December 2008
but just because they are the main branch of ign and gamespot (which has a lot of credibility) or not doesn't really make much of difference.. the criteria is "can they play games and review them efficiently" not "were they placed in the correct branch of gaming journalism"
Not even sure why i'm posting here, I still think numeric review scores are stupid since the written review is given value based on what the reviewer thinks is important, rather than the person (who skips reading the actual review) who is trying to find which game is best for themselves
