By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
MaxwellGT2000 said:
Ari_Gold said:
MaxwellGT2000 said:
Ari_Gold said:
MaxwellGT2000 said:
Ari_Gold said:
MaxwellGT2000 said:
Ari_Gold said:
i agree with mr bubbles, reviewers have come up with a different way to review Wii games, and don't compare them directly to their HD counterparts.

 

Well to be quite honest, you're ideas are usually wrong = I mean you said you beat me at Mario Kart when I didn't even play you and the only way you could have played me is joining a game my friend was playing while I was away.

That and the fact... that well facts say otherwise just like Gnizmo pointed out, people are directly comparing games like Shaun White, Guitar Hero, and Call of Duty on all the platforms vs each other, it's just usually Wii reviewers take the HD counterpart into the review while the HD review rarely takes anything from the Wii review, usually only compairing 360 vs PS3, cause they love to leave out the fact that Dual Analog sucks for FPS and Wii remote and Mouse and KB destroy it

geez not that crap again. You're posting your opinion as a fact, and to be quite honest, its bad for vgchartz. Your opinions are different than mine, that doesn't make them the absolute truth you know. This is a place for civil discussion, not just I THINK Wii MOTE IS BETTER.. BLA BLA BLA... Dual Analogs don't suck for FPS, for every person that hates Dual Analog, theres another one that hates Wii remote. Yes the Mouse and KB destroys everything including the Wiimote, but thats not what this thread is about huh?

 

 

Whenever you want to play mario kart just say it, i'll gladly admit defeat.

 

 

Facts are facts, fact dual analog is not as fast as Mouse & KB nor Wii remote for FPS, fact dual analog is not as dead on accurate as Mouse & KB or Wii remote without an auto lock feature, fact dual analog takes longer to do a quick look around then Wii remote and Mouse & KB. Those are undisputable facts and thing is with FPS games control is everything, the faster you can move, turn, aim, and react is the difference between winning and losing.

Facts are facts. The PS3/360/PCs FPS's have much better graphics, much better online, more players, dlc, voice chat, than the Wii's. Those are undisputable facts and thing is with FPS games, graphics are everything. They push the genre foward, a FPS with shitty graphics won't sell. Online play has to be up to standards, which were set up by Halo 3, or even CoD 4.

 

Hope you like some facts :)

 

 

Wow that would be great if I didn't say Mouse & KB in each one of my points, but then again you said graphics are everything... and that alone makes your point's fall rather flat... I mean gameplay says HI! I didn't know that seeing a pretty shiny thing in front of you was more important then being able to play it well... you've shown me the light Ari how could I ever be so blind... *rolls eyes*

Seriously to support the dual analog controls over much better controls is like saying you like the N64 with 1 analog stick vs dual analog... dual analog wins every time but times change, games change, and progress needs to be made, we've had 3 gens now of dual analog on consoles there's better choices out there now for controls, much better choices.

 

You're just too stubborn. Graphics really matter for FPS, its what drives the games hype, and sales. You are hyping the Conduit because of its graphics are the best on the wii, i guess it caught your interest am i right?

 

Actually you couldn't be more wrong, I support the Conduit based on it's controls being fully customizable more along the lines of PC customization (hmm I'm seeing a trend that all goes back to PC), a good Wii FPS not set in World War II, an interesting story about government conspiracy, 16+ multiplayer online, LAN support (none of that splitscreen crap), Wii Speak support, and hopefully no friend codes. That and the fact it's obvious these guys are working their asses off to make a quality game on the Wii and believe in it so much that they would make it an Wii exclusive. Plus they're wanting to push things so far as to use Wii motion plus when that will release just before the Conduit releases and will be one of the few games to support it.

So why would I support it cause it looks nice? I mean I got a huge list of reasons to support it that are ten times better reasons to support it then pointless graphics.

 

You two are kinda eatin each others red rings of death so i wont interrupt, ill just say this...YOUR BOTH LIARS, Graphics are all that matter to Conduit and the Wii remote eats little kittys for breakfast, which is why ANY half decent looking /playing FPS is wanted on Wii.

COD WW is unfortunately not the example we wanted or maybe it is, maybe its the best the wii can do or maybe its not.................



“When we make some new announcement and if there is no positive initial reaction from the market, I try to think of it as a good sign because that can be interpreted as people reacting to something groundbreaking. ...if the employees were always minding themselves to do whatever the market is requiring at any moment, and if they were always focusing on something we can sell right now for the short term, it would be very limiting. We are trying to think outside the box.” - Satoru Iwata - This is why corporate multinationals will never truly understand, or risk doing, what Nintendo does.