Bodhesatva said: Erik is largely correct that casual players are the exact people who do not have brand loyalty to anyone, including Nintendo. The whole idea of being a "casual" is that they don't play many games and aren't obsessively aware of who is making what. Most do not look at the publisher's name on a box, and in my experience as a retail employee, even if they SEE a logo, they don't necessarily know that means who published it. Why would they? That could just mean a licensee or something. "Who published this game" isn't something these people even consider. As a similar example, I'll assume most of you aren't music enthusiasts. Listeners, sure, but not enthusiasts. Do you know who published your favorite albums? Don't look; just tell me. Was it Starshine? How about AMSI? How about Global Music? What's that, you don't know? How could you be so stupidly ignorant of a product you enjoy?
|
Zen didn't say loyalty though, he said preference. I'd agree there isn't any real brand loyalty going on, but Nintendo's been able to associate their name with gaming to a lot of folks who don't game on a regular basis. They may not be determined to buy a Nintendo product when they leave their house, but they certainly know that brand more than any other and when they have it narrowed down to 2 or 3 that Nintendo logo is going to mean a whole lot more than any music publisher logo ever would because of that widespread association.