Usually when people claim a review is bad it's often a case of them just being angry as a game they liked got a bad score. However in this case the OP is completly correct. That is a horrid review.
They give it a 4 for gameplay because ''Yes, the depth of management in this game is impressive. But, it’s not impressive enough to make up for the fact that you aren’t actually playing soccer.''
.... wtf. It is a football MANAGER game! That would be like reviewing Theme hospital and saying ''Well the management aspect is great but you don't perform the surgeries so it's rubbish.''
If the managing gameplay is brilliant in a managing game then it deserves a high score. They aren't adveritising it as fifa or something, it's a management game.
The lasting appeal is also a joke
''This game is aimed at a very specific audience, and it’s inconceivable to me that anybody outside of that audience could play even an hour of this game before turning it off for good.''
That would be like giving gears of war a 1 for lasting appeal because it's aimed at shooter fans and a 50year old housewife would probably not like it. If the game has good lasting appeal for the type of people that would actually buy the game then it has good lasting appeal!
This is a rare occasion where I think saying a reviewer should be fired is justified. The person clearly has no idea what they are doing.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
