badgenome said:
Staude said:
Aquietguy said:
markers said:
he used the ds because when the ds first was released it struggled. but after the dslite hit it soared like a mofo.
basically its a sound comparison, the ps3 is struggling, some say, in its first 2 years. and devs are just now getting the hang of it and a price cut is just around the corner (and heck maybe slim model around the corner after you round the first corner to the price cut)
those who say insert wii in said place doesnt make since. the wii hasnt struggled one bit. he wants to know if the ps3 can make a turn around like the ds did |
The problem with this theory is that the DS didn't have another hand held that got pretty much the same games as the PS3 has with the 360. Plus a lot of the success of the DS comes from it's innovative touch screen. The same with the Wii. There's really no innovation with the PS3.
|
The ps3 is atleast as innovative as the wii, probably more.
The amount of ps3 hate in this topic is at a level where it's almost unbelievable.
I've said it before, (having actually read the op unlike half the people who posted in the thread) the ps3 will have a huge rise in sales once it reaches mass market. I also still believe it'll pass the 360 once that happens (aslong as it's within a reasonable amount of time)
The tripple has yet to reach it's peak.
|
How do you figure that?
|
pseye, (it is innovation, even if they don't use it properly yet.. i wish they would though) sixaxis (sixaxis can be awesome, and it's motion controlling too. The wii doesn't provide proper motion sensing either so which one you wanna go with is 50 50.. the difference is just that the sixaxis was made to suppliment your gaming experience, not replace it. (ie. heavenly sword)) the os, (sorta :p) not to mention the unique and advanced hardware. You can innovate in many ways.
