*snore*
Pretty much every game in that list, where the difference actually matters, was an early port. On top of that, Eurogamer lists big titles like GTA4 and BioShock as being "better" on the 360, whereas most review sites have said the opposite -- in BioShock's case they generally rated the game lower because its a year old now, and because of some texturing screwups by the devs (which they were going to fix, as I recall -- they're lucky all PS3s have a HDD, IMO) ...but they still say its better than the original 360 version. I would expect the future 360 ports of 3rd-party PS3 exclusives, like Haze, to be superior to their PS3 counterparts, for the same reasons.
The actual difference between the vast majority of these games is miniscule, whether the "360 is better" or the "PS3 is better". Hasn't this topic been thrashed enough?
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
