chaospluto said:
Infamous said:
CGI-Quality said:
Not unexpected though. Sony had NO pricecut and still managed to sell 170,000 systems in just one region. I would not call this a failure but a delay in what's to come for PS3. It isn't that it's doing bad just not as good as we would like it to. Still great for 360 but, once again, this is not a shocker. $200 vs $400 - Yes 360 will continue this, especially during this time of an Economic Crisis the likes which we have not seen since the Great Depression. |
Wow, I don't mean to respond to you in another thread, but face the facts.
It was announced that only around 50% of arcades contributed to these sales. So, if 360 sold 310k, that puts it to 155k ARCADE units sold alone, meaning that 60gigs/Elites contributed to these great sales (which, if you've been following up, you would know because 360's are sold out almost everywhere in every SKU save an Elite here and there).
That means that, without $200 arcades, 360 STILL sold more than PS3 in others. Imagine when America pops up..
Point being, please let the "$200 price vs $400" thing go. Obviouslu price has a factor, OBVIOUSLY (throwing that in here for future flames), but come on now.. NXE, plathora of great games, etc..
And yes, the PS3 is doing well. We know.
|
Because $300 vs $400 isn't a big difference amirite? >.> Wait, you mean $100 difference sells units? ZOMG, nowais!
Let's see:
PS3 - $400, 80gig No Bundle -$500, 160gig + Bundle
360 - $200, Arcade No Bundle - $300, Pro + Bundle - $400, Elite + Bundle
I wonder why 360 sold more, I mean isn't it obvious? Come on man, don't be bashing when you don't even compare or throw facts in.
Edit: Oh yeah, also there were some Black Friday sales that shoved 360s for around $180. I seen a guy purchase a 360 for that price at my local Wal Mart.
|
