selnor on 29 November 2008
| KBG29 said: @disolitude I am not going to make a list, but the PS3 does have the games it needs already. Sony has plenty of exclusives that are very good, and worth playing. Just because a game does not sell 3 to 5 million does not mean it is worse than another first party game that does. As far as third party goes, Sony has not Lost an exclusive this gen. The games still come out on PS3, so just because they also come out on 360 that does not mean they are exclusive like some seem to believe. This generation is like every other generation before it. Price point and hype sell consoles, games do little to change the direction the market decides to take. Last gen the PS2 hit $199 fast and included DVD, this gen Wii started at $249 and had Motion and now 360 is at $200 with Live and Netflix. The gimicy things are what sell to the mainstream. Once PS3 hits $199 a whole new market opens to it, and all the sudden Home and Blu-ray are the talk of the town. Games sell gamers on buying consoles. For the rest it comes down to what the console does besides gaming that really matters. |
Yes the PS3 does have some great games. The problem is, it's HD competitor has more. As a previous PS2 gamer the 360 fits the bill more. I lover JRPG's, Hacknslash, beat em ups, Racing, sport, Adventure, FPS, TPS all genres really. On top of that the Live service is awesome. People are realising that for £129 you get a console with HD visuals and a very impressive library of games. It's great the PS3 has good games, as I said the problem is the 360 constantly improves it's library to. So the gap does not close.
