I got it on the PC and...I don't know, it plays a lot like Resistance 2's Coop mode (the same thing with semi dynamic levels where the objectives change, 8 players with different roles, tons of enemies in hordes, some of them zombies). I don't know if its better then R2s coop mode, I kind of like the class system and larger number of levels in the R2 coop myself, but I also like zombies, so its kind of a wash.
Of course....R2 also has a full fledged single player game and a real (both sides are equal) multiplayer which I found WAY more fun then the zombies vs humans version. The version I found myself playing 99.9% of the time was the group of humans version (it was WAY better put together IMO).
It really seems like it should have been 40 bucks tops like other primarily multiplayer games like Warhawk. It would have been a great game for 30 bucks or maybe even 40. At 50 for PC (or even worse 60 for 360) it seems quite half baked.
I mean half life 2's orange box cost the same 50-60 bucks and had portal, Halflife 2 (plus expansion) which was a good long single player in its own right and THEN also Team Fortress 2 which was multiplayer more or less on par with Left 4 Dead.
Its not the quality of the game I have issue with, its the value proposition. There is no way such a limited game (and it IS limited) should be full price. Its a 9.5 at 30 bucks and a 7 at 60 bucks.
It's not like the marketplace is lacking for multiplayer choices atm anyway whether you own the 360, PS3, PC or all 3.
PSN ID: ChosenOne feel free to add me
