Wii Graphics Outdated by 2011!!

[Narfer]

Kamahl said: Narfer said: you say gameplay is an opinion? well apparently most people agree on this opinion. but you want facts? well, i guess i wont argue gameplay cause that apparently doesnt count because the PS3 doesnt have it and the Wii does. heres some numbers: the wii is selling way more consoles and way more of each game. isnt that the ultamate statistic? or does the PS3 and all games get a thousand copies added on for graphics? Ever thought that the price might be a factor? Just look, the PS2 is still selling a lot, if the PS3 costed $250 like the Wii, i think the story would be really different, but we don't know, and since we don't know, everything you posted is stupid, cause you are talking as if price wasn't an important factor. * Most of the people seem to agree that Resistance is a better game than Wii's FPS, Red Steel and it IS selling more than Red Steel so stop pulling numbers out of your ass. Also, considering that there are less PS3s than Wiis and Resistance is still selling more, we got an extra point for Resistance. * Most of the people also agree that MotorStorm is better than Excite Truck. We got no sales yet to prove it but i'm pretty sure it will beat Excite Truck since almost everyone i know is getting it. You also said, the PS3 doesn't have gameplay and the Wii does, that is clearly one of the most retarded things i've ever read. The PS3 plays games just like we have always played them, you are basically saying that games from the past had no gameplay, nice one, retard. Narfer said: kamwahl, quit twisting everybodys words. I've never done that. Narfer said:the person who gave the statistic about the Wii sports sold, you said had nothing to do with what you said? well, what you said was that MY opinoin was it was more fun than any of those PS3 games Yeah, and my point still stands, a good game isn't the same as a game that sells a lot. According to your logic, the pokemon games are the best games ever. (I know mario has sold more copies but considering mario has been out there for 20 years and Pokemon a lot less, Pokemon is more succesful) The thing is that you are basically saying that PS3 games aren't fun to play, and this is exactly where you fail. Will you shut up now? Everyone with a brain would agree with me.

wow. i never mentioned price. maybe i should have, but dont accuse me of dismissing price as a factor when i actually neglected to mention it at all. i realize price is a factor, obviously more PS3s would sell if they were the same price as a Wii, but would they win? not right now they wouldnt. wiis would still have sold the same amount and PS3s would probably still be 2mil behind. but thats impossible to say. yea, but zelda has outsold all those games. i never mentioned red steal, its an alright game and got alright reviews, im sure resistence is a better game. although im sure many prefer red steel simply from the new game expirience it brings, but i wont get into that. i dont agree with your statement about excite truck, though. when i said the ps3 doesnt have any gameplay, that came out wrong. gameplay is the big thing, wii has new gameplay, and great gameplay. all ps3 arguers say is about graphics, i overreacted and said ps3 doesnt have gameplay, although it just has the old game play. here is the thing, wii can have the exact same gameplay as the ps3. but it can also have a completly new expirience. thats why its so great. it didnt do away with the old gameplay, it just added on a new way. games dont have to do the motion sensitive thing, its just there for big or small things that can add to the game. like you said, "The PS3 plays games just like we have always played them" for the past 20 some years. for the past 20 years, adding on better graphics and a bigger and better processor has been enough. then online play. all those were big jumps, just like someones post on here talked about. now, going to HD is a small jump, and online play is basically at a stand still. its good, not getting better. had nintendo just done what all the other consoles did, try to get the best graphics, sony would have won, nintendo and microsoft would have been basically tied for 2nd. even if nintendos nothing special system would have been $250, it would have still lost to sony. sony has been leading for years, so with nothing special out of the bunch, things would have basically continued. but nintendo didnt, they decided to do something different. and it got them a heavy lead in the console race, we will see about the xbox. just like with the DS, nintendo didnt do the same old thing and thats another reason it beat out the PSP. o, and BTW, the pokemon games are great. i still buy them, and im 17, call me a loser all you want, im not into pokemon, but those are good games. they sell alot because they are good. your saying that just becuase a game sells alot, doesnt mean its good, then you use pokemon as an example? bad example, i bet most everyone on here would agree, the pokemon series is a very good one, and i bet most poeple on here of any age and with a DS are considering buying one or have already preordered one of them.