Xen said:
Rei said:
Xen said:
Rei said:
Xen said:
I don't think they meant to say that IU uses the UE3 engine badly. I think they're talking about the lack of polish in recent SE titles and use IU as an example... |
Read the article, IGN clearly says that both games use UE3 engine.
Anyway, I only agree with #4 and #5.
- #1 is bs for obvious reasons.
- #2 I disagree with since TLR has quiet a good lip-sync and voice acting from what I saw and heard.
- #3 They suggest SE's jRPGs should become more like wRPGs (Fable 2, Obvlion) I dont think many Square/jRPG fans are gonna like this idea. And I'd like to know how come Oblvion's towns are "full of life and interesting characters"?
Overall this article is funny, not because it is completely wrong or something, as I said - I agree with #4 and #5. It is funny because IGN bashes a game developer for poor technical perfomance of their games, while at the same time IGN fails to make their own job done properly (as the journalists) in the very same article.
|
No, they don't. Beside the fact that they don't state that, it's well known that tri-Ace use their own custom engines.
|
Are we reading the same article? Because I see that sentense in there - Both use Epic's Unreal Engine 3
|
Wow, I missed it.
Didn't tri ace say that they're using their own engines though...?
|
tri-Ace said that they always use their own engines. We need to teach IGN a thing or two.
