For the last time dont bother translating graphical impressions i am NOT questioning the games graphics, I LIKE THEM.
You say the physics are "perfect" but then tell us there is a problem with them?
Again, I HAVEN'T PLAYED THE GAME, i simply said that a LOT of people who have played the demo claimed that it was a button masher.
Variety in enemies doesnt affect gameplay? Less than ten hours is a good thing if its repetitive as hell.
ALL i have done is question the premise this reviewer has given for the high score, with overwhelming praise for graphics but quoting numerous cons that damage gameplay. I also questioned their motives, as have many in this forum, as the magazine they write for is called 'PSX', which i assume means PLAYSTATION EXTREME
starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS
