(Probably) First Heavenly Sword review - This is next gen!

[starcraft]

windbane said:

starcraft said:
@windbane

Just as many people who HAVE played the demo claimed it was a pretty looking buttonmasher as claimed it was a good game. Take a glance through the HS forums on this site and you'll see im right. I was interested cause i wondered if it was worth buying a PS3 this yr on universally great HS reviews. They didn't come, it was 50/50 at best, so im not. And this review clearly states that KEY GAMEPLAY AREAS such as bosses, enemy variation, lack of secrets and poor collision physics are LACKING. The point is these reviewers have said that gameplay was lacking even if they didnt mean too. They clearly care more about graphics than anything else.

The demo was the GDC one, and you've now seen 2 reviews give it a 9 and 10.

But hey, judge away at minor flaws that you are overemphasizing. I guess reviewers shouldn't list a complete assessment so people don't pick apart their reviews.

 Minor things? Can some one please tell me what he just said, cause im clearly reading it wrong? KEY GAMEPLAY AREAS ARE NOW MINOR THINGS? Dont worry, i understand now.  The reviewers clearly place far greater emphasis on technical specs than gameplay, lenght and depth.  At first i couldn't understand why windbane was defending them, now i know.... he does too.