By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SamuelRSmith said:
Soleron said:
psrock said:
Faxanadu said:
nice, good job being socialist.

Taking the debts and risks of a few and distributing them evenly across the whole nation.

 

you make it sound like a bad thing.

It is. The banks took on the risk when they made the mortgages - and have profited considerably up until now from doing so. Now that the risk actually becomes real losses, the government takes all responsibiloity away from the banks. The underlying problem is an irresponsible attitude in the banking industry - which will not go away if the government lets them know they can do what they like and still be bailed out.

If I took a risk worth several times my cash deposits, the government wouldn't bail me out...

 

 

 The sub-prime mortgaging was down to the comission based system that the retail agents worked on. ie - the more houses they sold, the more money they got - I doubt they stopped to think about possible consequences from selling houses to people who couldn't pay for them, I'm pretty sure they thought that it wouldn't affect.

Also the difference between you and a bank is that if you took a risk and lost out, it wouldn't cause the world's economy to crash.

So thats why people will losse their jobs and fortunes. Because some incentive system was broke. How sad is that.

 



Any message from Faxanadu is written in good faith but shall neither be binding nor construed as constituting a commitment by Faxanadu except where provided for in a written agreement signed by an authorized representative of Faxanadu. This message is intended for the use of the forum members only.

The views expressed here may be personal and/or offensive and are not necessarily the views of Faxanadu.