windbane said:
How is it not credible? Am I making it up? No. The game is a 1-2 million seller every year guaranteed, and yet the Wii does not get it. It is the one sports title I buy every year, and yet it is not on the Wii. People keep blaming Sony as if it's their responsibility to code for people. Look, the PS3 came out later, it's a new way to program. EA isn't devoting the resources they need to to make the games equal. However, the games are only marginally worse and probably not as big of a deal as Xbox to PS2 was. Next year will be interesting. However, no one has an answer for my point, because the only one is that it is EA's fault. As shams pointed out, EA is also to blame for Boogie (now being ported to PS2), SSX Blur, and Harry Potter. |
Yeah it's sony responsability to make it affordable to code especially if you are the last one in term of market share so yes they are to blame..... the fact that EA suck is just the cherry on the cake..... but the pb is not only with EA almost every third party is reporting the same thing.....
why their game are not good or as good on PS3??? just because it's not worth spending the extra monney to make it look better..... end of the discussion we all know that..... and that's entirely Sony's fault.... especially since they are last one right now.... you can't force something on the third paries in any market if you don't dominate and especially if the production is higher than the competitors product.... a high school student with litlte knowledge in economy and business can understand and demonstrate it on a board....
and EA or any other third party is not supposed to devote anything to anybody if it's not worth it... and for that matter are not suppose to a game equal just for the pleasure of Sony or a customers.... that's a gamer fantasy, certainly not a business reality
