| endimion said:
it's not news that EA sucks and it's not news that EA sucks even more on PS3... and it's not news that a lot of third party dev have lower quality games on PS3 than 360 because it cost them more money to do the same or better on PS3 than 360..... I mean we knew that before PS3 was released... all/most DEVS said it at E3 and TGS 2006.... I mean all that stuff is at least 1 year old... and people are still surprised....
|
Ok so the fact thats it harder to develop a game for the PS3 isnt new news. But that means they have to work harder not just be lazy and put out crap games. The list at the top of this thread should embarass anyone who worked on this game.
Even EA has to have some sort of quality standards, they just forgot to add the wind generator for franchise games??????? or it cost to much money to write that piece of code???? or are they just lazy bums???
and yes Endimion a Xbox game cost $60 too, but they are actually getting thier money's worth. Playstation owners are better off buying the PS2 version cause you dont get your money's worth with the PS3 version.
and no one has commented on if they think they will release a gameplay patch to address any of these issues...
