Jordahn on 24 November 2008
| Resident_Hazard said: This just in: Sony fanboys still eager prove that any game that has to be released on multiple disks is awful. Desperate search to find inferiority in Xbox360 continues unabated. Who really cares if it comes on multiple disks? Honestly. You know, if I buy a DVD box set that costs $50 and comes on 6 DVD's, I don't complain. Actually, I complain when the same set releases on a one or two Blu-Ray disks and costs $60-70. Which is exactly how it seems to go. Two-disk DVD special edition of a recently released movie? $24.99. Single-disk Blu-Ray version of same film? $29.99. Which one says "value" to you. Game releases on PS3 on one disk. Same game releases on Xbox360 on 2 disks. Game still sells better on the Xbox360 anyway. |
The single Blu-Ray disc of the same film for $30 = better value because I'm getting the HD video and audio content I want while not being fool by the number of discs like, sadly, most of the masses. Fine example = the Edward Norton HULK which actually comes in two Blu-rays in which I paid under $24 though Amazon.
Is this really an issue if gamers get what they want?
Hackers are poor nerds who don't wash.
