|_emmiwinks said:
Your theory is based on infactual analysis. The PS2, GC and XBOX era didnt have any one console that was heads and shoulders more powerful then the others. The XBOX was only marginally more powerful then the other two. This generation the PS3 and XBOX360 are literally in a different league of power than the Wii. If that means anything I dont really care, its based all on games, and judging games is objective. |
While it's true that the divide between Wii and HD is pretty high (horsepower-wise), the Xbox was actually quite a bit more powerful than the PS2. Try 2-3 times as powerful. The reason the Xbox maybe didn't appear to be more powerful (and, for that matter, the substantially more-powerful-than-PS2 GameCube) was because the vast majority of games were built on the PS2 and simply ported to the other two systems.
The Wii is closer to the original Xbox than it is to the Xbox360, by a long shot. But, always remember that the original Xbox and GameCube never had their full potential realized, or their full power tapped. We actually really don't know how good games on the Wii can actually look. The Conduit will be the first title to give us some clue. Call of Duty: WaW and Star Wars: TFU could both look a lot better and more advanced and detailed on the Wii than they do. They are, quite simply, still PS2 ports.