Khuutra said:
Hardcore movie fans notice. It's odd, but it's true: they do exist, equivalent to us, viewing cinema as we view our consoles. But this is true in every other form of review, too. Music reviews, book reviews, movie reviews, car magazine summaries, whatever you want. Standardized opinion isn't demanded anywhere except in video games. What I am talking about is the fact that video game fans demand that reviewers all think alike, as if there is some objective standard to adhere to. That's worrisome. |
As far as I can figure, game reviewers tend to be more in line with mainstream sales more often than other media. This has been the case for years. It's not always so (licensed games are a big outlier for this), but often enough that people think game reviewers are part of the mainstream. Even more importantly, there is a perception of concensus for the last few generations. Even if Okami didn't sell well, there appeared to be a consensus.
It's just that with the Wii throwing this off, there's a lot of confusion about what reviewers should and shouldn't like.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs