PS3 GPU. Not by far, but still better for most of the graphical..." /> PS3 GPU. Not by far, but still better for most of the graphical..." /> PS3 GPU. Not by far, but still better for most of the graphical..." /> PS3 GPU. Not by far, but still better for most of the graphical..." />
By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
BrayanA on 24 November 2008
Edit Thread

I wrote this before:
"Most important part for high graphic games is GPU. 360 GPU > PS3 GPU. Not by far, but still better for most of the graphical operations. Cell is cell, but without strong GPU even Core 2 Quad Extreme is useless. Don't get me wrong. You still need strong CPU for great physics, A.I., etc.

If you optimize for 360 GPU, when porting to less powerfull PS3 GPU you need to sacrifice something (framerate, resolution, etc) to make things to run or to downgrade it visuals."

PS3 can't win a round, cos this comparisons are based on graphics. PS3 wins in pop-ins and load times (not GPU related) , but loose in resolution, framerate and screen tearing (GPU related). With NXE PS3 will loose most of its advantages, cos now xbox users can install games if they want. This will make pop-ins and load times nearly same on both platforms.