| dgm6780 said: Yes it takes extra time and money to develop games for the PS3. And that is why they raised the prices for PS3 games vs PS2 games. We are paying for the extra time and effort it takes, now if they would actually put in the extra time and effort to make a next gen game. and sinha I cant really reconcile my 2 statements, I dont know what to think. I tried looking at IGN for the 2 reviews of Xbox and PS3. I seen 2 different scores, a whole point lower for PS3, but when I went to read the article it was the exact same article. It doesnt matter if its on all the versions or just PS3, either way they sold me a $60 game that plays like they just left out the quality testing phase and rushed it out the door. which is unacceptable. if they cant make a game for the PS3 then dont make a game for the PS3, but instead they choose to just rip off PS3 owners and sell them a broken game. |
the thing is it's harder than XB 360 and we are also paying 60 for that game.... so that's why....
then again nobody asked you to buy a PS3 or an EA game... I personally never buy EA since the 2nd NFS on PC.... I have some EA games but pre owned....
it's not news that EA sucks and it's not news that EA sucks even more on PS3... and it's not news that a lot of third party dev have lower quality games on PS3 than 360 because it cost them more money to do the same or better on PS3 than 360..... I mean we knew that before PS3 was released... all/most DEVS said it at E3 and TGS 2006.... I mean all that stuff is at least 1 year old... and people are still surprised....
I mean I'll trust a shitty dev from the shittiest dev studio of EA or activision over any marketing statement from anybody from sony.... what amaze me it's in 50 years of Sony's existance they still didn't get it....
