| dbot said: @Selnor - You published this other person's post as your own, http://www.howardforums.com/archive/topic/1066963-1.html. If you are going to troll, you should use your own thoughts. I don't know if I should respond to you or somehow contact the original poster and tell him my thoughts.
Take a look at the article below. I don't see the 360's processor on this list. Game on: NVIDIA, PS3 hardware in Top 500 Supercomputers listBy Jon Stokes | Published: November 18, 2008 - 06:56AM CT "The really new trend—the one that just recently began and that will only accelerate—is the increasing presence of game-oriented hardware on the list. At the top of the list is IBM's Roadrunner, which first rode the power of the Cell chip to the top spot in June. Roadrunner epitomizes both trends in that it combines a modified version of the processor used in the PlayStation 3 with AMD's Opteron. But the Cell isn't the only coprocessor on the list that has its roots in gaming. " -- http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20081118-game-on-nvidia-ps3-hardware-in-top-500-supercomputers-list.html |
Point one. You have to be the biggest troll Ive ever seen. How about you try think link in the second word of the OP. I forget, where do I mention I wrote the entire article????? I merely made it less trolly than the original copy.
Your second point. The cell is a strong CPU. You seem to miss the point. When the Cell is inside the PS3 it losses 2 SPE's for game programmers straight away. What the OP is showing is the numbers breakdown of Cell in PS3, not Cell in general. Cell in PS3 is significantly restricted.
How about read and click on links in the OP before trolling.
